As of Friday, September 08, 2006 20:16:50 -0400 this is what we have on this specific dream drawing prediction. If your able to help provide proof or information on this specific drawing, please click here to send me an email. Please include the exact date of the dream or the DD number. And again, thank you for your time, its very much appreciated.
The space shuttle is scheduled to go up July 1,2006,on a restocking mission to the International Space Station it is called STS-121 and the commander's name is Steve Lindsey. Perhaps you want to send your dream about the water problem to NASA. You also signed the picture EC. Edgar Cayce perhaps???
well sent to nasa now its up to them to do what they want to with it.
lenny567
reply
Hi, thanks...they will not believe you, or me...have tried many times in the past.
Brian
6.23.2006
Aloha Brian:
More info on the space shuttle launch. Still no mention of water problem only foam.
Charly
Maui
reply
Thanks again Maui, posted.
Brian
NASA explains tangled shuttle decision
Even if orbiter is damaged, crew should be safe, officials say
Updated: 7:57 p.m. HT June 21, 2006
The decision of two top NASA managers to vote against the upcoming July 1 launch of the space shuttle Discovery pivoted on the risk of losing the orbiter, but not its astronaut crew, the officials said Wednesday.NASA chief engineer Christopher Scolese and the agency’s top safety officer, Bryan O’Connor, said that, despite their objections, neither official believed the planned launch of Discovery’s STS-121 mission carried unacceptable risk for the seven astronauts making the space shot.“We felt that the risk was to the vehicle and not the crew,” Scolese told reporters during a teleconference, adding that NASA’s plan to keep shuttle astronauts aboard the international space station if their orbiter is damaged and can’t return home is vital to crew safety. ”While it’s an undesirable situation to be in, it is certainly something that’s viable and provides us with the additional security for this mission.”Scolese and O’Connor each cast a negative vote for Discovery’s scheduled July 1 liftoff during a standard Flight Readiness Review meeting that concluded on Saturday. Their concerns revolved around the hazard posed by foam insulation that could fall from a series of ice frost ramps coating brackets on shuttle’s external tank and strike the orbiter. (Click here for NASA chief Michael Griffin's rationale for the STS-121 launch decision.)External tank launch debris has been a serious concern since the 2003 Columbia accident, when damage from a foam strike breached that orbiter’s heat shield during liftoff and led to its destruction, and the loss of seven astronauts, during re-entry. Despite more than two years of work and modifications, large foam pieces were seen falling from Discovery’s fuel tank during its STS-114 launch last summer.Discovery is now poised to launch its STS-121 crew, commanded by shuttle veteran Steven Lindsey, on a 12-day trip to the space station. The flight will test new fuel tank changes, methods for shuttle inspection and repair, and deliver fresh supplies to the station.“The crew is OK with this, as I’m sure you’ve heard them say,” O’Connor said of the launch decision.Future fix NASA shuttle officials have given two main reasons for not delaying Discovery’s STS-121 flight until a proper ice frost foam ramp fix is ready.First, Discovery’s current fuel tank has already been stripped of a 38-foot (11-meter) foam-covered ramp to reduce the amount of debris that could shake loose during launch. The change constitutes the biggest aerodynamic modification to the shuttle launch system in 25 years, and should be tested alone without additional changes, NASA officials have said.Adding to that is the absence of a viable ice frost ramp modification.“Right now we really don’t have an ice frost ramp fix,” William Gerstenmaier, NASA’s associate administrator of space operations, said in the teleconference.A fix could be ready by the end of the year, he added.Safe haven Meanwhile, the space station is primed to support nine astronauts — including the two members of Expedition 13 already onboard the station — for more than 80 days should it be required to provide safe haven for the STS-121 crew, NASA officials said. But it is also not a situation shuttle managers want to put Discovery’s crew into unnecessarily.
“Putting nine people on that space station is a real stress,” O’Connor said. “It’s not like you’ve brought them home yet.”But with the risk posed by the ice frost ramps understood and accepted by Griffin and other top agency officials, O’Connor said he felt his concerns had been heard.“I felt that I was not going to lie down in the flame trench or throw down my badge,” O’Connor said. “We now go forward and see if we can get this vehicle off the launch pad next week.”
6.23.2006
this could be it for both
Mission: STS-121 - 18th International Space Station Flight (ULF1.1) - Multi-Purpose Logistics Module Vehicle: Discovery (OV-103) Location: Launch Pad 39B Target Launch Date: July 1-19, 2006, 3:49 p.m. EDT Launch Pad: 39B Crew: Lindsey, Kelly, Sellers, Fossum, Nowak, Wilson and Reiter Inclination/Orbit Altitude: 51.6 degrees/122 nautical miles
Aft closeouts of Discovery continue, and payload bay inspections and closeouts are complete. The payload bay doors were closed for flight early Tuesday. Flight crew system workers finished checkouts of the extravehicular maneuvering units, which are stowed in the airlock, and airlock closeouts are complete. By the end of today, all checkouts of the external tank and solid rocket boosters will be finalized, and those components will be closed for flight.
On the mobile launch platform, six sound suppression water system nozzles on the north side of the space shuttle main engine flame hole were removed after corrosion was discovered. New nozzles are scheduled to be welded in place this week.
lenny567
reply
Hi, thanks, posted.
Brian
7.9.2006
Brian, I just wanted to inform you that we have been taking your dreams seriously and it turns out that you were right, although some people in higher positions than I want to take credit for something they did not truly earn. Your drawings have help us find a problem that could have potentially destroyed Discover upon re-entry. Ironically, the same issue that caused the STS-107 disaster came floating by the Discover on day one, video was taken by the ship crewmembers.
I'm still a skeptic, yet if it's possible that someone can predict the future, you're the man. By the way, I'm going to see to it that you do get credit for this; watch the news over the next few weeks.
Sincerely,
J.
JPL
reply
Hi J,
Thanks for the support, people have been taking credit for my work ever since I stared posting my dreams on the web. At first it did anger me, but I leaned over time to not let it bother me, as long as people's lives were saved, that was the importnt thing. I do not need credit for this, I'm just glad everything is working well for NASA now.
Take Care,
Brian
Hi Brian,
Have you seen the following article from Space.com which goes into greater detail about the foam problem? It appears that WATER (or frozen water) may have caused the problem. There is also talk about liquid oxygen lines. I’m almost afraid to watch the launch. I’m hanging around the house today. The weather here is cool and rainy. I’ll send you any other updates if/when they occur.
Best wishes and I hope you and your family have a lovely 4th.
Hi Gooby, thanks for this, see the launch went well, great news.
Brian
This story was updated at 4:09 p.m. EDT.
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. – NASA managers decided Monday to continue preparing for the planned July 4th launch of the space shuttle Discovery, even as engineers evaluate a piece of foam insulation that popped free from the spacecraft’s fuel tank.
A team of engineers is poring over a small piece of foam about three inches long which cracked, then fell, from a bracket connecting a 17-inch feed line that supplies super-cold liquid oxygen to Discovery’s engines from its orange external tank.
The foam piece is small, weighing just 0.0057 pounds, less than half of the upper limit – 0.013 pounds – for acceptable debris during a shuttle launch, NASA said.
“It looks like this small piece of bread crust,” said John Shannon, NASA’s deputy shuttle program manager, during a press briefing here at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). “What we decided to do was continue with the plan that we were on.”
That plan, Shannon said, is to complete the loading of cryogenic fuel aboard Discovery to power the spacecraft during its planned STS-121 spaceflight. Meanwhile, tank engineers will analyze whether Discovery can fly with the lost foam on July 4, or if the shuttle will require inspections and repairs at its Pad 39B launch site.
Results from that study will be presented during a Mission Management Team (MMT) meeting at 6:30 p.m. EDT (2230 GMT), which is led by Shannon, where a final decision will be made.
“Getting to it is not an issue, but it would be a schedule hit to us,” said NASA launch director Michael Leinbach. “We cannot accomplish getting access to this area and also support the launch tomorrow morning. It’s just not possible.
Discovery is currently scheduled to launch Tuesday at 2:37:51 p.m. EDT (1837:51 GMT) on NASA’s STS-121 mission to the International Space Station. The planned spaceflight is NASA’s second shuttle flight since the 2003 Columbia accident.
Shannon said Discovery’s STS-121 crew has been notified of the foam concern. The mission’s commander Steven Lindsey asked several questions during a short MMT meeting earlier today, with the rest of the crew briefed later, he added.
Falling foam
Fuel tank foam loss has been a great concern for NASA since the loss of the space shuttle Columbia, which suffered a heat shield breach by a chunk of the insulation and was destroyed during reentry – its seven-astronaut crew lost – on Feb. 1, 2003.
Since then NASA engineers worked to streamline the amount of foam on shuttle fuel tanks, replacing some insulation with heaters after the Columbia accident and removing one large section altogether after the 2005 launch of Discovery’s STS-114 mission.
The piece of foam found by inspectors Monday fell from the topmost of a series of brackets connecting a liquid oxygen feedline to Discovery’s external tank. That top bracket is just above and to the right of the bipod fitting that mates Discovery to its fuel tank.
“It looks like it just came off all in one nice piece from the crack,” Shannon said.
By NASA’s current understanding, Sunday rain showers – which led to that day’s launch scrub – led to condensation on a bracket joint that froze into ice from the super-cold liquid oxygen inside the nearby feedline.
That ice later pinched into the surrounding foam as Discovery’s external tank warmed and expanded, a normal occurrence as engineers emptied the 526,000 gallon vessel of its super-chilled liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen.
John Chapman, NASA’s external tank project manager, said inspectors discovered the crack during a routine examination conducted after every launch scrub.
The piece fell sometime during that three-hour inspection, and was seen by engineers as they moved the protective Rotating Service Structure into place around Discovery, he said.
Current concerns
NASA officials said that the liberated piece of tank foam seen today could not have damaged Discovery’s heat shield during a launch.
“It would not have been an issue,” Shannon said. “It is less than half the size that we think can cause damage to the orbiter.”
Shuttle managers don’t believe the foam loss will impact the ability of Discovery’s fuel tank to withstand the heating stresses it will experience during launch. Analysis is still underway to determine whether any other cracks or damage are afflicting tank bracket.
The potential of ice to form over the area exposed by the foam loss is also a concern, since major foam loss or ice debris could be a hazard for the black, heat-resistant tiles lining Discovery’s belly.
“I do know that we have more insulation in this area than we absolutely needed,” Chapman said, adding that analysis is underway to evaluate the ice concern. “I expect that that analysis will show [we’re] good.”
NASA’s STS-121 MMT meeting will meet at 6:30 p.m. EDT (2230 GMT) today. The results of that meeting are expected to be released later this evening.
7.9.2006
Video from shuttle shows ice chunk
Alleviates crew concern about a thermal blanket popping off
By JOHN KELLY FLORIDA TODAY
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- NASA's second post-Columbia external tank shed some foam debris during launch Tuesday, but far less than the first return to flight tank.
The quick first look at Tuesday's launch films by shuttle program engineers and outsiders show at least five instances of debris flying off the shuttle, and some involved multiple fragments of what appears to be the orange foam insulation that coats the external tank.
However, the debris pieces all appear in early analysis to be small and all came off too late in flight to strike the orbiter with enough force to damage the orbiter's heat-shielding.
"At the end of the day, I'm very pleased with the performance of the tank," shuttle program manager Wayne Hale said five hours after liftoff.
He was quick to point out that not all of the launch photography and video is available to the engineering community yet and analysis of the imagery will continue for several days.
Mission managers planned to meet today to begin going over anything with even a remote chance of endangering Discovery and the astronaut crew.
Video from a camera mounted on the external tank gave the best early look at what happened to the foam insulation during the nine-minute trip to space.
At about 2 minutes, 57 seconds into flight, it appears that several pieces of debris came off handcrafted foam that covers metal brackets holding pipes to the side of the external tank.
"Too early to tell," Hale said when asked if the pieces came off those foam wedges, called ice-frost ramps.
The ramps are targeted for a future redesign precisely because they are capable of shedding dangerously-large debris. NASA's top safety official and its chief engineer wanted them redesigned prior to launching Discovery and seven astronauts on this mission.
They were overruled.
Hale said Tuesday night that although the ramps appear not to have shed big pieces of debris on this flight, the shuttle program is moving forward with plans to redesign them.
"Just having one good flight under your belt doesn't mean that doesn't need to be done," Hale said.
Astronaut Steve Frick, working in Mission Control in Houston, told commander Steve Lindsey that at least one piece of foam hit the orbiter's tiles somewhere between the main landing gear door and nose landing gear door.
That happened, however, at a time when the foam would have imparted almost zero force when it hit, Frick said.
NASA repeatedly announced prelaunch that some foam would keep coming off the tank.
The agency's space operations chief, Bill Gerstenmaier, characterized the ice-frost ramp debris as good news because it came off too late in flight to do harm while providing great data for engineers to use to try to figure out why pieces of the ramps are coming off.
Consequently, that could help the team determine the best changes to make on future tanks.
NASA Administrator Mike Griffin and external tank program manager John Chapman said in interviews before launch that the foam-loss problem was not about eliminating all debris.
Rather, it was about making sure only small pieces came off and only after the point in flight -- about 135 seconds after liftoff -- when it becomes difficult or even impossible for the foam to do harm to the shuttle.
"Frankly, once we get above a certain altitude, we don't care if the whole damn foam protection system fell off because it can't hurt you," Griffin said. "We wouldn't care if it all comes in little bitty chunks. It's all a matter of time and size."
One other debris incident arose when Mike Fossum, one of the astronauts aboard Discovery, saw a piece of what he thought was thermal protection system fabric floating away from the orbiter after reaching space.
Fossum said the piece was as large as eight feet across.
He videotaped it while shooting footage of the external tank falling away from the orbiter.
Once engineers got a look at it, however, they determined the unusual-looking white debris was really ice that had fallen off a space shuttle main engine.
The telltale sign was it broke apart as it fell back toward the Earth, something a solid blanket would not have done
dream diary navigation
For the lasted information on my dreams, please visit my Dream Forum here, or see below for the very latest posts.
Dream Discussion Forum 
TV Archives 
Dreams via email 
Dream readings by me for you...and less than $10
Chat about this DD with me 
Get email updates on this dream 
