Is it possible that DD7333 :
they knew no radar Florida flight school could be related to the 2 x Air France linked DDs, DD5996 & DD7331 ?
An air traffic controller for 18yrs from says re flight AF447 :
The plane wasn't in radar contact. This is perfectly normal. Radar has a limited range and there's no radar coverage over oceans. Position is verified by radio report.AFR447 left a large debris field. That could be attributed to a couple of things...either the plane came apart before it hit the water (bomb or airframe stress) or ocean currents and wind have spread the debris.
There's no evidence that a bomb didn't cause the disaster. There's also absolutely no evidence that it did. There was a bomb threat on another Air France plane earlier, but no bomb was found.
There was convective activity in the area. Pilots receive weather briefings before flights, but that's not even close to a surefire solution for avoiding turbulence. Neither is onboard weather radar, because it only sees precipitation...not turbulence.
If the fly-by wire's redundant systems all fail, it's practically impossible to control the aircraft. That said, the A330 is no more inherently "dangerous" than any other wide-body commercial aircraft.
Brian has already linked these 2 DDs :
DD5996 France plane hijacked 416
3 men dark suits, ML ST UL
DD7331 - "
3 men, 416, France Air,
not wiring bus 41-- ST UL - Stevens, hijack GMS" - (missing from translation M underlined. Also drawn arrow pointing something positioning? sea? country?)
Also, DD7353 - "Ayman 41,
not wiring box,
three men, 2 from Turkey, Iran, the base, ESHAN, Bureses building 4th floor" (? spelling of Bureses compared to whats hand written? )
Could it be that this DD is related too, as it mentions
3 men &
not wiring box - the same as mentioned in DD5996 & DD7331?
That would give us, 3 men in dark suits, 2 from Turkey, 1 from Iran, with initials ML ST UL (ST possibly Stevens), that may have been trained at Florida flight school? Perhaps on board AF447 with bombs set, although Brian says, hijack, but no one has claimed responsibility.
Matthew James, on his website mara-gamiel.blogspot.com has mentioned insights into explosions being on the plane.
Air France flight AF447 that went down in the ITCZ (Intertropical Convergence Zone), a solid band of clouds that moves north & south of the equator & being a well known rainfall area (peaks in June) with updrafts, lightening storms & a weak magnetic field, has rarely caused any serious problems to civil aviation in the past.
Brilliant site covering Air France flight AF447
http://www.weathergraphics.com/tim/af447/ with a thorough analysis, including comments from airline pilots from around the world & other professionals where the majority are going on the weather status on that day being the possible cause of the loss of the plane, but was not the only factor. Only very few have mentioned possible explosion or terrorist act.
Kind regards
Z
Author